polewmom.blogg.se

Parallels versus fusion
Parallels versus fusion







parallels versus fusion

Intel Core 2 Duo or higher Intel-based Mac required (Intel Core Solo and Core Duo processors are no longer supported.)

  • MacBook Pro Core 2 Duo 2.4GHz Santa Rosa.
  • Radeon 5870 and Quadro 4000 test scenarios.
  • 2TB HD striped RAID array for VM storage.
  • 120GB OWC Mercury Elite on 6GB/s SAS PCI express card for system disk.
  • Mac Pro dual-hexacore Westmere Xeon 2.66 GHz.
  • parallels versus fusion

    For the sake of consistency, I'll cover Parallels first and follow up with VMware Fusion's results.

    parallels versus fusion

    Differences are covered, and where there's a directly comparable result between the two apps, I've awarded a winner for that category. VMware's feature updates sounded familiar-3D performance updates, Lion-specific interface enhancements, and OS X 10.7 virtualization support-so we decided to throw both programs into one review. Shortly after we started reviewing Parallels Desktop 7, VMware released a major update to its rival consumer-oriented virtualization app VMware Fusion, now at version 4. (Read our original Parallels 6 and Fusion 3 reviews for more on the older versions.) We stripped the hype wrappers off of the new Parallels Desktop 7 and VMWare Fusion 4 to see who's the baddest, and who's just bad. The powerhouses of Mac OS X virtualization both got beefy updates in the last few weeks and they're begging for comparison.









    Parallels versus fusion